Files
obelisk/README.md
T
tommy0103 9fc7f202f0 feat(app): add weekly recap cards with swipeable story UI and export
Introduce a Spotify-Wrapped-style recap feature: five themed cards
  (Cover, Path, Vibe, Workflow, Closing) rendered per archetype palette,
  with keyboard/swipe navigation and image export via capture IPC. Add
  RecapList, RecapDetail, RecapExport views and recap component library.
  Wire recap:list/read/updated IPC channels through preload, document the
  retrieval-to-card contract in references/recap-patterns.md, and bundle
  dist-renderer for production use.
2026-06-14 03:16:49 +08:00

186 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown

<div align="center">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset=".github/assets/obelisk-wordmark-d.svg">
<img src=".github/assets/obelisk-wordmark-l2.svg" alt="Obelisk" width="540">
</picture>
[![stars](https://img.shields.io/github/stars/tommy0103/obelisk?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/tommy0103/obelisk/stargazers)
[![version](https://img.shields.io/github/v/tag/tommy0103/obelisk?label=version&style=flat-square)](https://github.com/tommy0103/obelisk/releases)
[![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg?style=flat-square)](LICENSE)
Every past session, subagent, and workflow -- queryable by your agent.
**Humans should not browse session history. Agents should query it.**
</div>
<br />
<div align="center">
<img src=".github/assets/demo.png" alt="Obelisk in action" width="540">
<br />
<p>Ask in plain language. The agent writes the query, runs it, answers.</p>
</div>
## Not a session browser
Most history tools help humans find old chats.
Obelisk is built for agents. It exposes past work as structured data: sessions,
messages, tool calls, subagents, workflows, file history, failures, parent
chains, and human-approved markdown memories. The agent writes the query, runs
it locally, and answers in plain language.
You don't manage history. You ask questions about past work.
## Why Obelisk
| Session library | Obelisk |
|---|---|
| Find an old chat | Answer a question about past work |
| Human browses snippets | Agent writes and runs a query |
| Search result list | Structured context and reasoning |
| Sessions as documents | Sessions as queryable memory |
| Good for recall | Good for investigation |
## What you can ask
```
/obelisk 上次 auth bug 最后到底改了哪些文件,为什么这么改
/obelisk 这个文件最近在哪些 sessions 里被反复修改
/obelisk 找出最近失败的 tool calls,它们分别发生在哪些任务里
/obelisk 那个 review workflow 的 subagents 各自结论是什么
/obelisk 我之前有没有试过这个方案,结果为什么放弃了
```
Anything Claude Code has done before -- sessions, tool calls, subagents, workflows -- becomes structured, queryable memory. Ask in your own words.
## Install
```bash
npx skills add tommy0103/obelisk
```
Or manually: copy `obelisk/` into your project's `.claude/skills/`.
Then in any Claude Code session:
```
/obelisk <your question>
```
First run builds the index (~5 seconds for 100 sessions). After that it rebuilds incrementally.
### Requires
- Node.js 22+ (uses built-in node:sqlite with FTS5)
- Claude Code with skills support.
## How it works
```
You ask a question
Agent writes a JS query against the SQLite index
Runs it via node runtime.mjs --query <script>
Reads the JSON result, answers you in natural language
```
When a retrieval produces a memory worth keeping, the agent proposes a markdown
memory file. After user approval, it registers that file with the narrow
`runtime.mjs --attune <script>` runtime, which exposes only memory mutation
helpers such as `remember()` and `forget()`.
Memory is a synthesis cache, not a replacement for raw sessions. The agent can
decide whether to use, ignore, or verify a memory during an answer. Persistent
changes still require human approval, but explicit corrections count: if you say
a memory is wrong, outdated, or should be replaced, the agent can archive or
update the exact matching record without a second confirmation.
**The core idea: don't make humans browse, tag, or organize sessions.**
Don't invent a rigid query DSL either.
Agents can write code. So Obelisk gives them a small local query runtime over
your past work.
The agent starts from a small core API, then uses structured shortcuts and
references only when the question needs them:
**Core primitives** — the main CodeAct surface:
- `search(text)` — FTS5 full-text search, returns matches with surrounding context plus message `content_type` and `is_meta`
- `context(uuid)` — full story around a message (parent chain, subagent/workflow metadata)
- `sql(query, ...params)` — read-only SQL for structured queries
**Structured shortcuts** — overview, session, memory, summary, subagent,
workflow, file-history, failure, raw-window, and parent-chain helpers over the
same SQLite data.
**References** — agent reads on demand when the task needs deeper structure:
- `references/schema.md` — full SQLite schema and API reference
- `references/query-patterns.md` — copyable CodeAct recipes for common retrieval tasks
- `references/retrieval-semantics.md` — query design frame for scoped and synthesis retrieval
- `references/recap-patterns.md` — optional `/obelisk recap` card content contract
- `references/pitfalls.md` — scope, FTS, ordering, compact/raw, and field-name traps
The executable SQLite schema lives in `scripts/schema.sql`; `references/schema.md`
is the human/agent explanation of that contract.
The design is progressive disclosure with guardrails: the main skill keeps the
core contract and high-risk pitfalls visible, while longer recipes and the full
schema stay out of the first prompt until the agent needs them.
The optional recap reference is only for the explicit `/obelisk recap` intent;
it is not part of the ordinary retrieval path.
## What gets indexed
| Layer | Source | What's captured |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| **Sessions** | `<project>/<sessionId>.jsonl` | Title, project, timestamps, git branch |
| **Messages** | user + assistant turns | Full text, model, token usage, parent chain |
| **Tool calls** | every tool invocation | Tool name, input, file paths touched |
| **Subagents** | `subagents/agent-<id>.jsonl` | Agent type, description, full conversation |
| **Workflows** | `workflows/wf_<runId>.json` | Script, structured result, agent count |
| **Workflow agents** | `subagents/workflows/wf_<runId>/` | Per-agent transcripts linked to workflow |
| **Memories** | markdown files registered by the agent after user approval | Prior conclusions linked to source sessions/messages and optional anchors |
Full-text search via FTS5 covers message text across every session layer and ranked memory recall over registered memory summaries, while the SQLite tables preserve the structure agents need for investigation.
## Structure
```
.claude/skills/obelisk/
├── SKILL.md # Skill definition + simple API + examples
├── scripts/
│ ├── schema.sql # Executable SQLite schema
│ └── runtime.mjs # Indexer + query runtime (zero deps)
└── references/
├── schema.md # Full table schema + advanced API reference
├── query-patterns.md # Copyable retrieval recipes
├── retrieval-semantics.md # Query design frame for retrieval semantics
├── recap-patterns.md # Optional /obelisk recap card content contract
└── pitfalls.md # Scope, FTS, ordering, and compactness traps
```
## Implementation Notes
The index rebuilds incrementally — only new or modified JSONL files are re-parsed.
When the optional app is running, it is the active indexer: it watches Claude
project files, builds in a worker thread, writes `__app_heartbeat__` plus
`__app_last_successful_build__` into `index_state`, and the skill-side lazy
build skips work only while both markers are fresh.
Zero npm dependencies. Uses Node 22's built-in node:sqlite with FTS5. The entire runtime is ~400 lines.
20K lines of scattered JSONL → something the agent can search() and sql() against in milliseconds.
---
## License
MIT @tommy0103