DashScope rejects the OpenAI-style value "minimal" with
`'reasoning_effort.effort' must be one of: 'none', 'minimum', 'low',
'medium', 'high', 'xhigh'`, but nanobot was passing the string through
verbatim. Users who tried the documented "minimal" to disable thinking
got a 400; users who tried the DashScope-native "minimum" to work
around it got `enable_thinking=True` because the internal comparison
was a hard string match on "minimal".
Introduce a semantic/wire split in `_build_kwargs`:
- `semantic_effort` is the internal canonical form (OpenAI vocabulary).
"minimum" on the way in is normalized to "minimal" here so both
spellings share one meaning.
- `wire_effort` is what we actually serialize. For DashScope with
semantic_effort == "minimal" we translate to "minimum" on the way
out; other providers are unchanged.
- `thinking_enabled` and the Kimi thinking branch now compare on
`semantic_effort`, so either user spelling correctly disables
provider-side thinking.
Tests:
- Strengthen `test_dashscope_thinking_disabled_for_minimal` to assert
the wire value is "minimum" in addition to the extra_body signal;
the original version only checked extra_body and let the
invalid-value bug slip through.
- Add `test_dashscope_thinking_disabled_for_minimum_alias` so a user
who read the DashScope docs and configured "minimum" still gets
thinking off.
- Add `test_non_dashscope_minimal_not_retranslated` to pin down that
the DashScope-specific translation does not leak to OpenAI et al.
`append_history` previously used `strip_think(entry) or entry.rstrip()`
as a safety net, so if the entire entry was a template-token leak (e.g.
`<think>reasoning</think>` or `<channel|>` alone), the raw leaked text
was still persisted to history — later re-introducing the very content
`strip_think` was meant to scrub, via consolidation / replay.
Persist the cleaned content directly. When cleanup empties a non-empty
entry, log at debug and store an empty-content record (cursor continuity
preserved). Adds 3 regression tests in test_memory_store.py covering:
- Well-formed thinking blocks are stripped before persistence.
- Pure-leak entries persist as empty, not as raw text.
- Malformed prefix leaks (`<channel|>`) also persist as empty.
Some models / Ollama renderers occasionally emit tokenizer-level template
leaks that the existing regexes miss:
1. Malformed opening tags with no closing `>`, running straight into
user-facing content — e.g. `<think广场照明灯目前…` (observed with
Gemma 4 via Ollama). The earlier `<think>[\s\S]*?</think>` and
`^\s*<think>[\s\S]*$` patterns both require `>`, so these leak into
rendered messages.
2. Harmony-style channel markers like `<channel|>` / `<|channel|>` at
the start of a response.
3. Orphan `</think>` / `</thought>` closing tags left behind when only
the opener was consumed upstream.
Handles each case conservatively:
- Malformed `<think` / `<thought` only match when the next char is NOT
a tag-name continuation (`[A-Za-z0-9_\-:>/]`). Explicit ASCII class
instead of `\w` because Python's Unicode `\w` matches CJK and would
defeat the primary fix.
- Orphan closing tags and channel markers are stripped **only at the
start or end of the text**. `strip_think` is also applied before
persisting history (memory.py), so mid-text stripping would silently
rewrite transcripts where the tokens themselves are discussed.
Preserves: `<thinker>`, `<think-foo>`, `<think_foo>`, `<think1>`,
`<think:foo>`, `<thought/>`, literal `` `</think>` `` / `` `<channel|>` ``
inside prose or code blocks.
Adds 16 new regression tests covering both the leak cases and the
preserved-prose cases.
hlgandXubin Ren