review(dream): harden line-age annotation per review feedback
Follow-up to #3212, fully backward compatible: - Extract the 14-day staleness threshold as `_STALE_THRESHOLD_DAYS` module constant and pass it into the Phase 1 prompt template as `{{ stale_threshold_days }}`. The number lived in three places before (code threshold, prompt instruction, docstring); now there is one. - Add `DreamConfig.annotate_line_ages` (default True = current behavior) and propagate it through `Dream.__init__` and the gateway wiring in cli/commands.py. Gives users a knob to disable the feature without a code patch if an LLM reacts poorly to the `← Nd` suffix. - Harden `_annotate_with_ages` against dirty working trees: when HEAD blob line count disagrees with the working-tree content length, skip annotation entirely instead of assigning ages to the wrong lines. The previous `i >= len(ages)` guard only handled one direction of the mismatch. - Inline-comment the `max_iterations` 10→15 bump with a pointer to exp002 so future blame has context. - Add 4 regression tests: end-to-end `← 30d` reaches prompt, 14/15 threshold boundary, `annotate_line_ages=False` bypasses git entirely (verified via `assert_not_called`), length-mismatch defense, and template-var rendering. Made-with: Cursor
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Staleness — MEMORY.md lines may have a ``← Nd`` suffix showing days since la
|
||||
- Age only indicates when content was last touched, not whether it should be removed
|
||||
- Use content judgment: user habits/preferences/personality traits are permanent regardless of age
|
||||
- Only prune content that is objectively outdated: passed events, resolved tracking, superseded approaches
|
||||
- Lines with ``← Nd`` (N>14) deserve closer review but are NOT automatically removable
|
||||
- Lines with ``← Nd`` (N>{{ stale_threshold_days }}) deserve closer review but are NOT automatically removable
|
||||
- When removing: prefer deleting individual items over entire sections
|
||||
|
||||
Skill discovery — flag [SKILL] when ALL of these are true:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user